logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.05.25 2017고정740
사문서변조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) delivered KRW 50 million to one (50 million) to one (50 million) securities C in the middle of the establishment of a university-friendly branch; and (b) discussed with C that B invested KRW 50 million in C instead of receiving KRW 50 million from C, with the Defendant’s request.

However, as the Defendant demanded that “C transfer money,” the Defendant had the mind to show by altering the details of the remaining account transactions which are likely to mislead B to be used individually without remitting the money to C.

On July 25, 2013, the Defendant printed out the Defendant’s account transaction details issued in the name of a national bank using a computer at the Sungdong-dong 2, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, Inc., Ltd.’s office, and prepared and printed out the Defendant’s name C using a computer. The Defendant changed one copy of the transaction details by inserting C’s name on the part in the column of “division / received” of the transaction statement and copying it. At that time, the Defendant displayed the said transaction details modified at the above location to B without knowledge of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the accused by the prosecution;

1. A asserts that a copy of the passbook of a national bank account in the name of the suspect, a copy of the Internet output data on the entry and withdrawal of a bank account in the name of the suspect, and a transaction statement of entry and withdrawal of a national bank account in the name of the suspect [the defendant is not a document on the proof of fact, but a document on the transaction of this case is not a document on the proof of fact, but a change in

However, the instant transaction statement is a document evidencing that the Defendant’s specific transaction details are the Defendant’s national bank account, and its issuing subject is a national bank, and it is another person’s document evidencing the fact.

arrow