logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2012.10.24 2012고단1503
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 9, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on September 9, 201 and completed the enforcement of the sentence in the Seoul detention center on May 23, 2012.

1. On June 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 21:30 on June 12, 2012, 2012, at “E operated by D, a victim of the second floor C, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; and (b) on fact, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if the victim received alcohol or alcohol from the victim; (c) was done as if he would pay the price; and (d) was issued from the victim an alcoholic beverage amounting to KRW 204,00 at the market price.

2. The defendant of "2012 Ma1530" did not have an intention or ability to pay the price even if he drinks in an entertainment tavern;

Nevertheless, around 23:30 on June 17, 2012, the Defendant, at the entertainment drinking house called Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, sent an attitude as if he would pay the drinking value, and ordered the victim G, who is the above main manager, to do so, and then acquired the amount of KRW 836,00 in the market price, such as two weeks and one week, from the victim.

3. On July 18, 2012, from around 21:00 to around 03:30 of the following day, the Defendant, “2016,” committed an act as if he did not have an intention or ability to pay the drinking value, but would normally pay the drinking value, etc., in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government HH entertainment tavern, and was provided with the victim I, who is the operator of the said main shop, with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 1,363,00, and acquired it by deception.

4. "2012 Highest 2305".

A. Around 20:00 on June 5, 2012, the Defendant, against the victim J, expressed the same attitude that the Defendant would pay the amount normally to the victim, even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the amount even if he did not order the drinking and the drinking. This was obtained from the victim, who received the same attitude that the Defendant would pay the amount normally to the victim.

B. The Defendant against the victim M is guilty on August 21, 2012.

arrow