logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.12.17 2015고단105
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 경범죄처벌법위반 피고인은 2015. 1. 18. 13:20경 평택시 B에 있는 평택경찰서 C지구대에서, 술에 취한 채로 들어가, 그곳에서 근무 중이던 위 지구대 소속 경사 D에게 “야 씨발 커피 한 잔 가져와봐!”라며 욕설을 하고, 위 D이 “무슨 일 때문에 오신 거냐 ”라고 묻자, 위 D에게 “이 씨발! 내가 탈북자인데 새터민 몰라 이 씨발 놈아! 똑바로 해! 나 탈북자야!”라며 소란을 피우고, 그 후 음주측정을 하려는 위 D에게 발길질을 하며 “내가 나와서 다 죽여 버릴 거야!”라고 소리치는 등 약 20분 동안 관공서인 위 지구대에서 술에 취한 채로 몹시 거친 말과 행동으로 주정하고 시끄럽게 하였다.

2. Around 14:45 on the same day, the Defendant continued to be compelled to go to the office E office of Pyeongtaek-si Police Station located at Pyeongtaek-si, which is 67 at the center. However, at the same time, the Defendant was asked by the Defendant F of the Victim F, who is the superintendent of the police station affiliated with the above police station, who was working at the police station, asked questions about what the personal information is by the Defendant, G (n, 42 years old), etc., and the victim expressed that “The Defendant was the North Korean in which the cex head of the cexa, and the Defendant was the North Korean defectors of the cexa, why the cex in the face of the cexa, and that the cex

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 1, took a bath to the above victim F (the age of 35), and used the victim’s face to gather a cell phone owned by the Defendant, and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement of the police officer in G and its complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of F and H

1. Relevant Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, Articles 311 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow