Defendant

In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The victim was in an internal relationship with the victim of mistake of facts, and the victim’s sexual intercourse with each other is not a threat of force by taking advantage of the victim’s intellectual disability status.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Part 1 of the case of the Defendant is only the Defendant and the respondent for attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”).

The court below found the defendant guilty of having sexual intercourse with the disabled victim by force on the ground that it is sufficiently recognized that the victim had sexual intercourse with the victim's speech that he would not be allowed to talk with others, even though the victim had intellectual disability but had a specific and consistent statement on the case, and that the victim had sexual intercourse with the disabled victim by force, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below found the defendant guilty of all the charges of this case that the victim had sexual intercourse with the disabled victim by force on the ground that the victim had sexual intercourse with the victim's speech that he would not want to talk with others. In full view of the victim's statement in court other than the evidence presented by the court below, in particular, the victim's speech and behavior, and the contents of the case's statement, the victim's mental intelligence index attached to the certificate of disabled person prepared and investigated by the court below, that is, the victim's mental disability index, social well-being index (which means that the victim's mental disability was easily damaged by the victim's daily life and social disability.

Although the victim is the victim.