1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The details and details of the disposition are companies established around December 2012 and engaged in the design and construction business for interior.

On March 12, 2013, the Plaintiff subscribed to employment insurance and industrial accident compensation insurance on March 12, 2013 at the workplace, and purchased the employment insurance and industrial accident compensation insurance on January 18, 2013 at the workplace.

On May 15, 2014, the defendant selected the plaintiff as a workplace subject to the final settlement of employment and industrial accident compensation insurance premium in 2013, and followed the final settlement procedure.The defendant, as a result of 84,023, 1163, 306, 698, 97, 567, 5637, 590, 506, 407, 567, 507, 467, 504, 467, 50, 467, 504, 467, 50, 467, 50, 467, 208, 50, 467, 50, 167, 563, 590, 590, 707, 464, 5305, 7647, 467, 5064, 757, 46064, 7674

On December 2, 2014, based on Article 19(4) of the Act on the Collection of Insurance Premiums, etc. for Employment Insurance and Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance (hereinafter “Employment Insurance Premium Collection Act”), the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of imposing KRW 118,256,090 on the industrial accident compensation insurance premium in 2013 and KRW 46,02,810 on the employment insurance premium.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [The grounds for recognition] did not dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the plaintiff’s argument as a whole, the defendant is "A, etc." in combination with Gap 2 and non-dried designs.

The estimated total amount of remuneration was calculated, including cost of outsourcing, cost of materials, etc. paid to the public.

However, A et al. produced the signboard, furniture, lighting, etc. ordered by the Plaintiff and installed it directly at the construction site of the Plaintiff.