1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition as set forth in the following (2).

2. Parts used or added;

A. The judgment of the court of first instance is 3-A.

In light of the following circumstances, the statement Nos. 3 and 5 of the evidence Nos. 1-1 and 2 and the overall purport of the pleadings, the fact-finding results with respect to the director of the tax office of the first instance court (as for the evidence No. 10, the same as the evidence No. 34, 35), and the following circumstances, the statement Nos. 3, 5, 10 (as for the evidence No. 10), 13, 14, 15 through 23, 26 through 33, and 36, and the fact-finding results with the fact-finding inquiry results with respect to the racing of the court of first instance.

B. Judgment 3 of the court of first instance

A. 2) The following is added to the last part of paragraph (2) of the same Article (6 3 and 4). “F’s representative director present at the court of this case 2018 or 25299, which was initiated at the same time with the instant case, and at the Defendant’s request, he testified to the effect that “A’s representative director is the M of the instant building directly performing the construction work, and F is not related to the said construction cost, and F is not entitled to the construction cost from I,” and that “A’s representative director was adopted as a witness at the Defendant’s request, and is consistent with the Defendant’s above assertion.”

A person shall be appointed.

C. 3-B of the judgment of the first instance.

Pursuant to paragraphs (6) and (3) below:

the following shall be added to this subsection:

C. Even if the Defendant’s obligation for the construction price that the Defendant accepted through the instant sales contract was against I’s F, it would be based on the Plaintiff’s order of seizure and collection.