logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2017.10.17 2017고단797
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the 'D Game Center' with the 3th floor of Gangnam-si C.

No one shall exchange or arrange for exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water, and shall provide game water with contents different from those of the game water classified by the council of the water grade members for the use thereof.

1. On February 17, 2017, the Defendant established 40 game machine “E” in the above game room and exchanged the remaining amount after deducting 10% from the points that an unspecified number of customers, who found the above game room, acquired through the use of the game product, from the points that they acquired through the use of the game product, by March 3, 2017.

As a result, the suspect was engaged in the business of exchanging tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

2. On February 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obtained 100 points from the head of the game room in the instant game with respect to one fore-mixed from which the enemy group was launched by the water grade member conference; and (b) obtained points from the head of the game room in the form of a class in the scocoon; (c) even if it was classified into a class in the form of a group indicated in the scoon, the Defendant installed 40 for the “E” game machine (class classification number: F) the cumulative amount of the winning amount of which is altered so that the cumulative amount of the winning amount of the game can be separately indicated in the window, and provided an unspecified customer who uses the head of the said game with a game product using the contents different from the rating received by the Game Water Management Committee.

As a result, the Defendant provided game water different from the rating of the game water management committee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Responses with the results of appraisal;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. A report on internal investigation (as to the opening or alteration of a game product), a photograph of a game product, a report on internal investigation (as to the window for the settlement of alteration or opening of a game product), a report on internal investigation (as to the speed of the game product opening or alteration), and a report on internal investigation (as to the game product opening or alteration of a game product);

arrow