Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 28, 2016, around 00:23, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the head of the Seocho Police Station Central Security Center in front of the Seocho Police Station, which was under the influence of liquor, that the Defendant was travelling along India and the road; and (b) requested the Defendant to return home to E apartment, which is a residence, to the slope D belonging to the Seocho Police Station C District of the Seocho Police Station, which was called to the site; and (c) on the same day, the said slope D was moving back to the E apartment way, the Defendant’s residence in the Sinsi City F, 00:30, and requested the Defendant to return home, and under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol.

c. Flaz. Masman Masman

1. The value of the tax base shall be calculated by adding to G;

Market Israin

b. Schchronia

"In doing so, the defendant's fingers the chest of the above slope D with the hand hand of the defendant, and assaulted the police-free antenna attached to the right side of the above slope D, such as putting the chest of the above slope D on hand, and cutting the police-free antenna.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers on site sailing, public safety and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order [The defendant and his defense counsel stated that the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, and therefore, in light of various circumstances, such as the background and means of the crime of this case, the defendant's behavior before and after the crime of this case, etc., it cannot be seen that the defendant did not have or lacks the ability to discern things under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case, and therefore, the above assertion is rejected]. The defendant's reason for sentencing is against the crime of this case, and around 198.