logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2016.12.23 2016고단695
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant

A 7 million won, Defendant B 10 million won, Defendant C Co., Ltd., and Defendant C Co., Ltd. and D, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person engaged in the operation of F 25 tons of dump trucks. Defendant C is a business owner performing a comprehensive construction business with the location of the head office in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is a corporation that operates a comprehensive construction business in Jongno-gu J in Seosan City by being awarded a contract by I Co., Ltd. Defendant D is a business owner who manages safety and health management to prevent industrial accidents for employees belonging to C as the site manager of the above construction site and the person in general charge of safety and health management. Defendant C is a corporation that operates a specialized construction business, such as packing construction, with the location of its head office in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and carries out a specialized construction business, and Defendant B is a business owner who takes over packaging construction, and the victim L is a business owner who performs the above dump construction work under subcontract from C among the "Civil Works for the Establishment of the Environment-Friendly Technology Research Center" among the "Civil Works

1. On April 30, 2016, Defendant A, among the “Civil Works for the Establishment of H-Friendly High Technology Research Center,” located at the Seosan CityJ on April 10, 2016, Defendant A driven a package work site and a dump truck with a F 25 tones of F 25 tons, was proceeding again for the packing work of asphalts.

At the same time, there were many workers and construction workers at the same construction site, and dump trucks are high in the height of vehicle loaded, and it is difficult to check back again because the range of view is not wide. In such cases, the Defendant, who is engaged in dump trucks, has a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as performing works in accordance with the direction of signal number, by making the dump trucks well look at the rear, and performing them.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so and followed by negligence while doing mixed work without a signal number of instructions.

arrow