logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.03.26 2014고정2372
사기
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 3, 2013, the Defendant was an employee in charge of the Defendant’s modern social loan at the dump shop located in Daegu-dong, Daegu-gu, and the Defendant did not have been requested to transport dump trucks or to transport wastes in the area south-west, but did not have any particular property, and even if he purchased dump trucks in the form of installment financing, he did not have an intent or ability to repay it, despite having no intention or ability to transport waste in the form of installment financing from the victim’s company, the Defendant had a career of transporting waste in the area south-gu, and three years’ career of driving dump trucks. The Defendant purchased dump trucks to transport waste to the (Dump truck) area in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and thus, the Defendant would have repaid the loan because it would have to have been repaid because it would have been a dump truck with the purchase price of 25 tons dump truck in the name of his employee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to applications for social goods, applications for goods used in modern society society, actual examination list, construction machinery register, and copies of construction machinery register;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 5,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. The judgment on the criminal intent of defraudation under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code (i.e., the first offender, the defendant's possession to D and E, the actual profit of the defendant was not high, the damage was compensated, and the victim and the defense counsel reached an agreement with the victim) of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code. The criminal intent of defraudation is that the defendant was subject to the instant loan by deceiving D and E, and that he was willing and capable of repaying the loan.

arrow