1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name - B Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Defendant - Public notice; Gwangju Metropolitan City public notice on July 6, 2012;

B. On September 17, 2013, the Defendant filed an application for adjudication on the instant project with the Gwangju Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee, and filed an application for adjudication on each land and each obstacle listed in the separate sheet, such as the Gwangju Dong-gu E-ground Parking Lot (hereinafter “instant parking lot”). However, the Defendant did not file an application for adjudication on the compensation for operating losses on the inn which the Plaintiff claims on the ground of Gwangju Dong-gu D (hereinafter “instant innngu”).

(c) The date of adjudication of expropriation by the Gwangju Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee - the date of adjudication of expropriation: December 12, 2013 - Land and obstacles listed in the separate sheet owned by the plaintiff - Compensation for losses: The calculation shall be based on the arithmetic average of the appraised values assessed by two appraisal business entities (in the case of the instant parking lot, on the basis of 10.4 square meters in public record): the date of commencement of expropriation: January 26, 2014.

On August 21, 2014, the date the Central Land Expropriation Committee makes an objection - The content of the ruling on the objection - The amount of compensation for expropriation of each land and obstacles owned by the plaintiff shall be calculated based on the arithmetic mean of the appraised values assessed by two appraisal business entities, and the amount of compensation for expropriation of each land and obstacles owned by the plaintiff shall be deemed reasonable and the objection shall be dismissed [based]. The facts that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 5 (including each number), and the purport of all pleadings.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion acceptance adjudication omitted in the amount of KRW 10,156,428 for business loss compensation for the instant innick business. ② The instant parking lot is indicated on the building ledger as the area of 10.4 square meters, but in fact there are 10 columns with a height of 10.3 meters, and the parking lot size is 11.53 square meters.