logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 10. 15. 선고 2015두46185 판결
(심리불속행) 압류예고통지는 관념의 통지에 해당할 뿐, 항고소송의 대상이 아님.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2015-Nu-20916 ( October 12, 2015)

Title

(A) Notice of attachment is only subject to the notification of concept, but is not subject to appeal litigation.

Summary

(The main point of the judgment below) The attachment notice merely notifies the plaintiff's deposit claim, benefit claim, etc. that if the tax in arrears is not paid within a certain period of time is expected to be seized, it cannot be deemed that it directly affects the rights, obligations or legal status, and thus, it cannot be deemed an administrative disposition that is subject to an appeal litigation.

Related statutes

Article 23 of the National Tax Collection Act: Demand and peremptory notice

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow