1. The plaintiffs' primary claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. Of the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiffs are the Defendants.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: F Zone Housing Development Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Public notice given by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on February 6, 2009: G - Business operator: Defendants, H Corporation (in the case of land located in Incheon Seo-gu (hereinafter referred to as “Seocheon-gu”), I, and J, H Corporation, K, and L, respectively);

B. The location, current status, etc. of the land jointly owned by the Plaintiffs are divided into the following: M, M, N (registration conversion with 3,653 square meters of O forest land on March 16, 2007), P (registration number change with Q.), R, S, T, U, V, W, and X land with an agreement acquisition - 5,851 square meters of Y forest land on March 23, 2010 (hereinafter “land before division”); Y land is divided into 1,834 square meters of Y forest land, Z, Z, 4,017 square meters of A, and 3,570 square meters of AA forest and fields (the Plaintiff’s share 10/100, 2, 300 square meters of A, 10/108/100 of D, 10, 100/10, 361 square meters of A, 20/36/10 of shares in A forest and fields after division, -360/10/1 square meters of ownership.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on January 21, 2016 (hereinafter “instant ruling”) - The Plaintiffs’ claim for the compensation of the remaining land expropriation or value depreciation relating to the instant Ldong land [based on recognition] does not dispute, Gap’s statements in subparagraphs 1 through 23 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. Judgment on the plaintiffs' primary claims against the defendants

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the remaining land of the Ldong in this case constitutes a group of land owned by the plaintiffs with other land owned by the plaintiffs, and it is possible to enter through the connected land owned by the plaintiffs, etc., but, in light of the size, shape, etc. of the remaining land of the Ldong in this case, it became a blind land where it is impossible to enter and leave due to the acquisition