logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.11.22 2018누37979
보상금의 증액에 관한 청구의 소
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance court, including a claim extended in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: F Zone Housing Development Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Public notice given by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on February 6, 2009: G - Business operator: Defendants, H Corporation (in the case of land located in Incheon Seo-gu (hereinafter referred to as the “Seocheon-gu”), I, and J, H Corporation, K, and L, respectively;

B. Consultation and expropriation (see Attached 1 drawings; hereinafter “AF A. A. 2”) - M, N (O. 3,653 square meters of forest land on March 16, 2007), R, S, T, U,V, W, X land on December 23, 2010 - Consultation and acquisition on forest land - Y5,851 square meters (hereinafter “YY land before division”) on March 23, 2010 (hereinafter “YY land”) is divided into 1,834 square meters (hereinafter “YY land after division”), A. 30 square meters of land A. - B. 4,000,000 square meters of land A. 20,000 square meters of land A. 30,000 square meters of land A. 5,000,000 square meters of land B. - 1,010,000 forest land and land B/1,010,00 square meters of land after division.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on January 21, 2016 (hereinafter “instant ruling”) - The plaintiffs’ rejection of a claim for compensation for losses arising from the expropriation of the remaining land or the depreciation of the value of the land at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue at issue / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap 1 through 23 statements and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. The plaintiffs' assertion.

arrow