beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant received a credit card terminal in the name of "E", which is located in Thailand, from a person who is not aware of the name residing in Thailand ("C"), to introduce a person who would be able to borrow cash by pretending to trade goods or services by credit card, and then deliver it to F, upon receipt of a request from the above C, and upon receipt of a credit card terminal in Thailand D department located in the D department store located in Thailand, the credit card merchant registered as a credit card merchant by the above C, and the F used it to receive 20% of the credit card sales amount as a fee, and the F is divided into the above "C" and "F," and then the Defendant conspired to deliver money to be used for committing a crime, proceeds from criminal acts, etc. and to have 1% of the
On May 18, 2011, the Defendant delivered a credit card device under the above E from C to F, and around the 19th day of the same month, F prepared a false sales slip as if I purchased a household of an amount of KRW 7 million with a new card from the above E store, which is equivalent to KRW 700,093,674, from the Plaintiff, from the Plaintiff, in the G located in Gangseo-gun, Gangnam-gun, Gangwon-gun, and then he received KRW 7,093,674 from the victim. Since then, the Defendant submitted the false sales slip to the new card of the victim corporation and received KRW 7,093,674 from the victim.
From May 19, 2011 to June 21, 2011, the Defendant, C, and C, as well as the F, extended a total of KRW 146,939,907 through 72 times, as indicated in the separate crime list, by pretending to sell goods. In such a case, the Defendant and C, and C, as mentioned above, were urged by submitting false sales slips to the credit card company as the victim, and were issued an amount equivalent to the same amount from the victims.
As a result, the Defendant conspired with F (F. 17. 201) and one-person C to arrange for the sale of goods.