The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 31, 2018, the Defendant stated that on March 31, 2018, at the victim D’s restaurant operated by the victim D, the Defendant returned the string flue, which was lost. However, the Defendant became aware where the string flue is located.

For the reason that he said that he was aware that he was her only that he was aware of the disturbance, he assaulted twice the victim’s face.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The records show that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendant on September 7, 2018, which was after the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.