logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.03 2015고단2186
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 13,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 20, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on November 20, 201, and the summary order of KRW 2 million to a fine in the same court on October 12, 201, respectively.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On November 25, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.152% without a driver’s license of a motor vehicle on November 25, 2014, and the Defendant driven the said motor vehicle at a speed that would not be known to the remote distance from the front of the 210-lane 4 lane in front of the Dongjak-gu Seoul, Dongjak-gu, Seoul.

Since there was a cross-section where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by thoroughly operating the vehicle in front and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting this, found the F&learning car driven by the victim E, who was driven prior to the operation by the Defendant due to the negligence of not complying with the operation, received the part concerning the rear-down part of the said F/L car as the front-hand part of the Defendant’s driver’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as light fluoral salt in need of treatment for about two weeks, while at the same time, the repair cost, such as the replacement of the fluoring passenger car, destroyed to the extent that 252,514 won was damaged, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the accused in the examination protocol of suspect;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each photograph;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Written estimate;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of criminal records and investigation reports (suspects' previous records and confirmations) and statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow