logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016. 01. 14. 선고 2015누44976 판결
감사관서가 감사권 행사의 일환으로 세무조사의 오류 및 시정을 위하여 거래상대방에게 부분적인 질문권을 행사한 것은 중복조사에 해당함[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Supreme Court-2014-Du-43257 (No. 28, 2015)

Title

As part of the exercise of audit authority, the exercise of a partial right to ask questions to the other party for the error and correction of the tax investigation constitutes a duplicate investigation.

Summary

As part of the exercise of the audit right, the fact that the audit office finds errors and irregularities in the first tax investigation and finds out the real transaction value by exercising the right to ask questions to the other party who trades real estate in order to correct such errors and irregularities falls under the duplicate investigation.

Cases

2015Nu44976 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff, Appellant

KimA

Defendant, appellant and appellant

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2013Guhap17220 decided March 28, 2014

[Attachment Judgment]

Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu47619 Decided September 30, 2014

Judgment of remand

Supreme Court Decision 2014Du43257 Decided May 28, 2015

Conclusion of Pleadings

December 17, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

on 14, 2016

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The defendant bears the total costs of the lawsuit after the filing of the appeal.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

A disposition imposing gift tax on the Plaintiff on February 10, 2012, stating the details of imposition of gift tax in the attached Form.

all of each subparagraph shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

This Court's decision is identical to the reasons for the first instance court's decision, and therefore, Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the citizen

It shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Private Litigation Act.

2. Conclusion

Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is groundless.

arrow