The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving a car at Cent Pest Pest.

At around 10:00 on April 30, 2015, the Defendant continued to proceed to the same east line from the later side of the northwest of the same northwest.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side of that place, in such a case, there was a pedestrian who drives a motor vehicle to drive the motor vehicle at the crosswalk by reducing the speed and by properly examining the front left, there was a duty of care to temporarily stop the motor vehicle, to check the safety after the passage of the motor vehicle, and to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and, even if the FF saw on the left end of the direction of the Defendant’s driving in the crosswalk, the Defendant was negligent in proceeding as it is without fault, and the part on the left side of the victim’s bridge traveling along the crosswalk to the right side from the left side of the direction of the driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant got about two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, resulting in knee knee knee knee knee knee kne, but failed to immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Judgment

1. The crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) of the Defendant’s occupational negligence is a punishment for the act of escape without taking relief measures against the victim on the premise that the accident driver is liable for the crime of bodily injury caused by occupational negligence. Therefore, the Defendant

The defendant, from the investigation stage to the time of this court, appears to be in the left side of the crosswalk before the defendant passes the crosswalk without signal lights, and drives the vehicle as it is.