A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfering with his/her duties on February 18, 2018, on the ground that at a “D” restaurant operated by the victim C on February 17:30, 2018, the injured party demands that the Defendant calculated food for the food of the Defendant.

The bit of bit of bitbit of bitbit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a x

2. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the time, place, etc. set forth in paragraph 1, and at the same time, at the 112 report of the disturbance, and committed assault, such as talking that “If this dog is the police station, the bitch f of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of punishment according to the sentencing guidelines for the Supreme Court] 1: Crimes under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the scope of punishment according to the sentencing guidelines for the Supreme Court : Violation of the Act on the Suspension of Duties: Violation of the Act on the Suspension of Duties: Violation of the Act on the Suspension of Duties: Violation of the Act on the Suspension of Duties: Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Crimes under Article 1 (Obstruction of Duties) in the basic area (Interference with the Execution of Duties). Violation of the Act on the Suspension of Duties: Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violations of the Act on the Suspension of Duties: Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violations of Duties: Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violations of Duties and Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violations of Duties.

shall not be deemed to exist.

Provided, That the defendant is under the influence of alcohol.