1. The defendant

A. Of the 6,673 square meters in the warehouse site in Gangnam-si, 20, 19, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, the annexed drawings are indicated.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. D, which was an owner of 6,673 square meters in the 6,673 square meters of the warehouse site in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s land”), leased the instant land to the Defendant.

(B) (A) the plaintiff was the person who was the plaintiff at the complaint, and the defendant also made a confession by the same assertion in the written reply, and the fact of lease was denied in the briefs dated June 21, 2019, but there is no evidence to prove that the above confession was contrary to the truth and due to mistake, the plaintiff's revocation of the confession is invalid).

On November 16, 2010, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the Plaintiff’s land.

C. The Defendant, among the Plaintiff’s land, used a portion of 740 square meters inside the ship (B), which connects each point of 21,22,23,24,21 in sequence, as a field yard, deposited waste. The Defendant installed a tree crushing machine on the ground (D) which connects each point of 34,35,36,37,38,39,40,40,41,34 in sequence, and installed a tree crushing machine on the 48 square meters above the ground (D), which connects each point of 42,43,44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 57, 57, 57, 202, 36, 37, 25, 37, 29, 37, 257, and 42.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 2 evidence (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff did not have the right to occupy the land of this case and was removed from interference based on the land ownership, and the removal and piling-down of each of the buildings of this case.