logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2017.07.05 2017고단157
사기
Text

A fine of KRW 1,500,00 for the crime No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, and a fine of KRW 1,500,00 for the crime No. 2 in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On March 31, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment for special larceny, etc. in the Daegu District Court and its decision was finalized on April 8, 2016. On November 10, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three months of imprisonment for special larceny, etc. and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year on November 18, 2016, and the decision became final and conclusive on November 18, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim C posted a false statement on the Internet at the Defendant’s residence located in the racing-si, that “S7 mobile phones will be sold when galloning jum,” and on November 16, 2016, the criminal defendant reported and contacted the Defendant’s above posted to the victim C who sent 300,000 won, “I will send S7 mobile phones when galloning gallon.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to deliver the money even if he received the money from the damaged party when he did not have S7 mobile phones.

Nevertheless, the defendant, as mentioned above, received 300,000 won from the victim to the new bank E account in the name of the defendant on the same day.

2. On December 2016, the criminal suspect against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F that “if you send KRW 260,00,00,00 to the victim F, you will send S7 mobile phones when you send to the victim F who reported the Defendant’s above posted on the gallon around December 4, 2016.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to deliver the money even if he received the money from the damaged party when he did not have S7 mobile phones.

Nevertheless, the defendant, as mentioned above, received 260,000 won from the victim to the new bank E account in the name of the defendant on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow