A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 06:20 on September 19, 2015, the Defendant driven a Frosch Rexroth under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.063% without obtaining a driving license from the front Do of the “D” located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D” to the front road of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.063%.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AF) Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Froman van.

On September 19, 2015, the Defendant, without a car driver’s license, driven the above mix while under the influence of 0.063% of blood alcohol concentration, and led to a two-lane road in front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, to drive a two-lane road from the direction of the new sapma distance.

Since vehicles are parked on the right side of the two-lanes at the time, in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes of the vehicle while considering the traffic situation in front to those engaged in driving business.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, who was parked on the right side of the victim G, which was parked on the right side due to the negligence of not accurately operating the steering and steering devices without examining the right side while neglecting this, and received the front part of the passenger car operated by the Defendant.

Due to its shock, the victim I's right hye and the bicycle owned by the above I, which had been pushed in India while being pushed in the future, got out of the floor. On the other hand, the victim J, who continued to be pushed out in the future and parked in the future, was the K K pressle car owned by the victim J.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence.