A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

(1) On December 14, 2007, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as a "driving") at the Suwon District Court, and (2) on April 18, 2008, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for the same crime at the same court. (3) On April 22, 2009, the Defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 2.5 million for the same crime, and (2) on April 22, 2009, the Defendant was a person who was engaged in driving of the Sudo Sksch Rex.

On February 20, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of 0.196% of blood alcohol concentration at 0.21:00, while driving the said passenger vehicle and proceeding in the direction of scambling on the side of the bus terminal in accordance with the first letter in front of the “Daundong Community Treasury,” located in the Sacheoncheon-gun, Gangwon-do, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant was in a state of being unable to properly operate the steering gear under the influence of alcohol, such as holding red on the face at the time.

Nevertheless, the defendant, while driving the above van under the above conditions, left the parking lot located on the right side of the operation direction due to negligence of not operating the steering gear properly, and was parked in the above parking lot, the part of the driver's seat of the victim C (the 49-year-old driver) driving car parked in the above parking lot was taken into the right part of the front-hander of the above van, due to the shock, and the above Rason's car was pushed back by the above e (the 32-year-old driver), and was parked behind the right side of the victim E(the 32-year-old driver) who was parked adjacent to it, and continued to take the side side side of the H of the G driver's vehicle parked adjacent to it.

Ultimately, the Defendant violated the foregoing two or more times even though he was unable to drive a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and again drive the said motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.