Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On December 5, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for a false accusation, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 12, 2015.

1. While the Defendant filed a complaint in response to each other on the E and the management right of the D Co., Ltd. operating the D Co., Ltd., and the legal dispute was prosecuted on the charge of forging documents in the name of E, false accusation, etc. (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2011No. 5577, etc.), the case in which the former E Co., Ltd. filed a complaint with eight persons, including himself and F, (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2013No. 45895) (Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office 2013No. 45895) was suspected of being prosecuted by the prosecutor, the Defendant was able to prepare a written complaint in joint signature with F, etc. without the consent of F, etc.

On May 2014, the Defendant, at the bar office located on the sixth floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office, (a) requested the said attorney-at-law to prepare a complaint as if he had the authority to obtain the consent of other complainants, and (b) requested the said attorney-at-law to prepare A, F, I, J, K, L, M, and N in the column of complainants, and (c) requested the said complainants to affix their seals affixed to their names and seals prepared by the said attorney-at-law office around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a letter of complaint in the name of F, I, J, K, L, M, or N, which is a private document related to rights and obligations without authority.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. On May 13, 2014, the Defendant, at the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office, had the said attorney-at-law submit the forged accusation as if it were duly established.

B. On May 23, 2014, the Defendant had an attorney-at-law in charge of the Defendant’s pleading at the Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court) who is aware of the forgery.