logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.02.21 2018고정1173
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 3, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months at the Seoul Central District Court for a false accusation, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 17, 2018.

1. Forgery of a complaint;

A. On July 2016, 2016, the Defendant forged a private document, even though he did not obtain consent from F to the Defendant’s filing of the instant complaint against the Defendant’s penal D and penal E at the Defendant’s home of Songpa-gu Seoul B apartment C, and without obtaining consent to the filing of the complaint against the Defendant’s penal D and penal E, using a computer;

1. Appellant G, F, H, A, the complainant;

2. Defendant D, E,

3. The complainants of the purport of the complaint shall be punished against the defendant for fraud or embezzlement.

(A) On July 4, 2016, the document written by the complainant G, F, H, and A was printed, and the F’s seal prepared in advance to the name of F was stamped.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of complaint in the name of F, a private document concerning a certificate of fact.

B. On July 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) submitted a forged accusation to a public official in charge of false name in the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office, Seocho-gu, Seoul, to the public official who is aware of the forgery.

2. Counterfeiting a mandate;

A. On December 2016, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) prepared a petition for damages against Defendant-type D and a letter of delegation of the lawsuit at the law office of the law office of the law firm of the third floor in the 1st floor in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City; and (b) did not obtain consent from Defendant-type F to file a civil lawsuit; (c) instead, for the purpose of exercising the computer, delegated the legal representation to the J attorney-at-law with respect to the claim for damages by the parties, who are not Plaintiff G, Defendant D, and the above parties; and (d) granted the following authority:

(m) the document written by G, F, and H in January 2016 is printed out and prepared in advance to the name of F.

arrow