The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is a favorable condition that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and repents his mistake, and that he has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime.

However, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the instant gambling opening and operating an illegal Internet gambling site; (b) such illegal Internet gambling is a highly dangerous crime that leads to a decrease in the sound sense of labor by promoting the gambling of the general public; and (c) the life of the gambling participant and the members of the family; (b) thus, (c) it is necessary to impose severe punishment; and (d) the Defendant took into account the Defendant’s unfavorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.; and (e) other various circumstances, which are the conditions for the sentencing specified in the pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the lower court is appropriate, and it cannot be deemed unfair because it

(3) The defendant asserts that "the punishment should be mitigated because he/she voluntarily surrenders," but even if the defendant voluntarily surrenders himself/herself, the court can voluntarily reduce the punishment for the person who voluntarily surrenders himself/herself, and it cannot be deemed unlawful on the ground that the court below failed to reduce the punishment or failed to make a decision on the allegation to reduce the number of self-denunciation."