The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (one year of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is advantageous to the defendant's confession and reflect on all of the crimes of this case, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment other than a fine of five million won under the Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Financial Users Act, etc., but on the other hand, illegal gambling through the Internet is growing in today's society. Such online illegal gambling is promoting the gambling spirit of the general public, thereby undermining the sound work awareness, and it is necessary for the country to impose severe punishment on the crime that is highly likely to destroy the lives of the participants in gambling and their family members. In light of the circumstances and contents of the crime of this case, the nature of the crime of this case is very poor, the size of the crime of the crime of this case, the profits generated therefrom, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the age and happiness environment of the defendant, the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, the judgment of the court below

3. (b) In the third chapter of paragraph (1), the term “T acquired from T” means “D name acquired from D”, and in the seventh chapter, the term “new bank account (U)” is apparent to be a clerical error in the “new bank account (S)”, and thus, ex officio correction is made pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure.

.