A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 1, 2012, from around 15:00 to 15:40 on November 1, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the business of the hospital by force by preventing the entry of patients who had come to the hospital from entering the hospital by avoiding disturbance on the ground that the victim did not make a discount on hospital fees within the D hospital operated by the victim C, which is located in the G, and thus, the victim C had no real capacity. There is an error in social life that the victim C had been unaware of what he had so far. It is so far. If it is revealed through a dentist who is in the very strong sense of social health, it would be difficult to say that he would be free from entering the hospital, thereby obstructing his hospital business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The facts charged as to assault against the defendant in the dismissed part of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order against the defendant is that the defendant committed several bombs on November 1, 2012, on the ground that the victim in the D Hospital in the operation of the victim C, which was located in the Innman City B, did not make a discount on the hospital fees, and the victim did not do so on his hand. This is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim expressed his/her intention not to want the defendant's punishment in this court on August 16, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted, and this part of the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.