logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.01.07 2017구단51539
국가유공자 등 요건 비해당결정처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff entered the Army on October 10, 1969 and served as a Vietnam War from February 11, 1971 to January 24, 1972, and was discharged from military service on April 30, 1972.

B. On July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for registration of persons of distinguished services to the State to the Defendant on the ground that “from September 19, 1971 in the Vietnam War, a sudden fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor in the cause of hospitalization occurred in the 101 Arts Hospital, such as severe fluoral fluoral fluor, during hospitalization, and was urgently transmitted to the Daegu National Armed Forces Integrated Hospital, etc., and was released from fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, but currently lost fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral flu

On March 4, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the determination on “non-conformity of the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State”.

C. On February 8, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) filed an application for re-registration with the Defendant of distinguished service to the State on the ground of the instant difference; (b) on February 8, 2017, during military service, the Plaintiff was suffering from poor environment, physical surgery, stress, etc. due to combat; and (c) filed an application for re-registration with the Defendant of distinguished service to the State; and (d) on April 6, 2017, the Defendant received a deliberation by the Board of Patriots and Veterans and Veterans Entitlement to the Plaintiff on April 6, 2017, “the instant disposition” refers to the “disposition of this case.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 6, Eul evidence 1 to 4 (provisional number) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is suffering from a position of a communications soldier who was dispatched abroad and constitutes the act of combat support, and the working environment of malicious conditions (speaket work), meals and surface of the water, electric speaks, and stressed stress on combat exits.

arrow