logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.05.28 2013고단637
수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 6 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 10,000,000 won.

Defendant

Co., Ltd.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates the wastewater joint prevention facilities in the name of “stock company B” in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and Defendant B (hereinafter “B”) is a corporation established for the purpose of conducting measurement agency business, environmental management agency, etc.

1. The above wastewater joint prevention facilities operated by Defendant A are jointly treated with a large quantity of wastewater containing water-quality pollutants discharged from the 25 wastewater discharge companies. Thus, in treating wastewater, it is necessary to treat the wastewater normally after going through the appropriate wastewater treatment process.

Nevertheless,

A. On August 20, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime of August 20, 2012: (a) on the grounds that the Defendant failed to take physical, chemical, or biological measures at the above corporation B wastewater treatment plants; (b) and on August 20, 2012, and thereby discovered in a City (Permissible Discharge Standards 1mg/L) which is a specific substance harmful to water quality while running gold from the Do gold facilities, 40.75m/L; (c) 13.086m/L; (d) 6 Ghana (Permissible Discharge Standards 0.5m/L; hereinafter referred to as “Permissible Discharge Standard 0.5m/L”); and (d) 6m2mm/L of waste water quality (2mg/L) 17.82mg/L; and (e) 17.6m/L 27m/L 3mg/ 7m of waste water discharge standards (hereinafter referred to as “Permissible Discharge Standards 60.7m/76m/g”).

B. On September 4, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime on September 4, 2012, the Defendant did not take physical, chemical, or biological measures at the instant wastewater treatment plant, and did not take any physical, chemical, or biological measures to treat water pollutants at the water treatment plant, and, on September 4, 2012, the Defendant did not take any measures from the water treatment plant, and on September 4, 2012, in the City (Permissible Discharge Standards 1mg/L) in which a specific substance harmful to water quality (Permissible Discharge Standards 1mg/L) was 42.12mg/L, 10.392mg/L, 6 price (Permissible Discharge Standards 0.5mg/L hereinafter referred to as “Permissible Discharge Standards”) 3.119mg/L, the total nitrogen (Permissible Discharge Standards 60mg/L hereinafter referred to as “Permissible

arrow