1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation on this part of the basic facts are as follows: (a) the teachers' disciplinary committee' disciplinary committee's disciplinary committee's disciplinary committee's disciplinary committee's resolution on two and three pages of the first instance court's decision is "in accordance with the resolution of the teachers' disciplinary committee' disciplinary committee's disciplinary committee's disciplinary committee's resolution on dismissal"; (b) the committee's "29 to 31" of the fourth and seventh parallel's "28 to 31" was amended by "28 to 31"; and (c) therefore, it is identical to the corresponding part of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance court's decision

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The illegality of disciplinary proceedings ① that the disciplinary committee of the Defendant University’s teachers’ disciplinary committee conducted a disciplinary resolution against the Plaintiff in a public agreement, not in a bearer voting method, is unlawful.

② Refusal of the Plaintiff’s request for perusal and disclosure of information on data, such as recording files, in the course of investigation and deliberation by the Gender Equality Council for the Defendant University violates Article 6(3) of the Regulations on the Prevention and Handling of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Violence.

③ The Defendant University Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s motion to challenge K disciplinary committee members and the request to avoid K disciplinary committee members without good cause.

④ Although Article 64 of the Private School Act provides that a sufficient investigation is required prior to a request for a resolution, the Defendant requested a resolution on disciplinary action only through a heavy disciplinary action proposal at the Defendant University Department without due process, such as providing the Plaintiff with an opportunity to vindicate or reflect.

⑤ According to Article 53-3(1) of the Private School Act and the articles of incorporation of the defendant corporation, prior to a disciplinary resolution or disciplinary action, the defendant violated the above provisions because it did not undergo a deliberation by the teachers’ personnel committee or obtained only ex post facto consent after a disciplinary resolution or disciplinary action.

B. The plaintiff who has no grounds for disciplinary action is dismissed as of the instant case.