beta
Text
Defendant
In six months of imprisonment for A and B, Defendant C is punished by a fine of one million won, Defendant D is punished by a fine of three million won, and Defendant D is punished by a fine of three million won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and Defendant B, as a siblings, are operating various electric product supply businesses in the trade name of N,O, and P from 121, 221, 121, 1, 221, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 1,
1. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C’s fraud are the head of Q Q leader who takes charge of the installation, maintenance, repair, etc. of electric facilities in the usfk unit camp flickls located in Gyeongdong-gu, Gyeongbuk-do.
The Defendants, as they supplied by Defendant A and Defendant B with the former that had already been supplied in the (State)R, deceiving the victim’s 19 Support Headquarters 19 of the United States Armed Forces in Korea and conspired to divide the former into the former. A.
On February 17, 2010, Defendant A and Defendant B entered into a supply contract to supply electric poles to the above camping Capitals in the camp-dong, Nam-gu, Daegu-gu, on February 17, 2010.
However, in fact, Defendant A and Defendant B had no intention to deliver the former owner.
As such, the Defendants conspired to induce T by deceiving the employees of the victim’s unit, and then received 770,000 won from T to the account under the name of the Defendant A as the pre-sale price around February 19, 2010.
B. Around March 17, 2011, Defendant A and Defendant B entered into a contract with the U on behalf of the victim U on behalf of the usfk No. 19 Support Headquarters 19 on the supply of the goods to the camp gymls, such as the above “A”, around March 17, 2011.
However, in fact, Defendant A and Defendant B had no intention to deliver the former owner.
The Defendants conspired to attract U’s employees in U’s name and deceiving them to transfer KRW 750,00 from the above employees to the account under the name of Defendant B under the name of the former employer around that time.
2. Defendant A and Defendant B’s frauds provide money as if they were new products to the victim usfk 19 support usfk.