beta
Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
2,800,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
Reasons
1. In light of the fact that the court below's sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment, and additional collection) declared by the court below is too unreasonable in light of the following: (a) although a voice response was made in the urine test in the grounds for appeal in the urine test; (b) it was recognized that the person suspected of administering one's medication was committed; and (c) actively cooperate in the investigation
2. On June 2010, the Defendant purchased a total of 3.39g Mescoptyes (hereinafter “Mescopon”) eight times from the early police officer to November 11, 2010, and sold a total of 0.34g mescopon by inserting locopon into a single-use injection machine for eight times, and inserting 3.0g mecopon over four times. In light of the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes, the Defendant again committed a repeated crime for three months after the completion of the last punishment (10 months), the frequency of each of the instant crimes, and the period of each of the instant crimes.
However, the defendant reflects his mistake in depth (it is difficult to believe the defendant's reflective attitude in view of the fact that he was the philophones and 5 criminals. However, it seems that the defendant has been able to repented in mind in that he denied his voice in the appraisal of the urines, but saw that he had been able to see after night and after night, in that he had followed the number of the following day). A criminal investigation report which the police and the prosecution wanting to take place was submitted for the reason that he actively cooperated with other narcotics criminal investigation by the police and the prosecution, and the defendant has been recognized that he had contributed to other narcotics criminal investigation by the police and the prosecution, and the defendant has committed a serious confluence in order to protect the family as the most most person supporting his wife and children and taking a normal home, and is subject to sentencing conditions such as age, health conditions, character