The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. It takes into account the following: (a) the Defendant’s erroneous determination of the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing regarding the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is recognized; (b) the Defendant has no previous conviction; and (c) the damage of the victim C is deemed to have been recovered to a certain extent by dealing with insurance; (d) with regard to the crime of subparagraph 1 of the judgment, the distance of the Defendant’s driving without a license is reasonable; (b) the blood alcohol concentration level was high; and (c) the Defendant’s negligence on the instant traffic accident, such as intrusion upon the central line; (d) the Defendant’s moving of the vehicle after the traffic accident was obstructed by blocking the victim from driving the vehicle; (e) the traffic accident occurred while the Defendant was driven without a license; (e) the Defendant was arrested while drinking the vehicle; and (e) the Defendant was punished by suspension of execution due to a pedestrian’s death after having been transferred around 202; and (e) the Defendant, despite the revocation of the driver’s license, even if he had not acquired the license again, the circumstances and circumstances before and after the Defendant’s driving of this case.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to do so. It is so decided as per Disposition.