1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates a D shop in the building Asan City (hereinafter “instant store”), and the Defendant served as a sales employee from June 2, 2017 to October 2, 2017.

B. The Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Defendant as an occupational embezzlement for the crime of embezzlement on the ground that “Irre, Nrrrre, Irre, Irre, Irrre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre and embezzled Irre, Irre, I would like to find that the Defendant's 60,000 won was sold to E at the event site of the burial event of this case around October 2, 2017.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence No. 2, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the total of KRW 179,00 and the total of KRW 300,000 for the clothes embezzled while working in the store of this case.

It is not sufficient to recognize that the Defendant embezzled the clothing of KRW 179,00,00 on the sole basis of each statement of evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including the number of branch numbers) and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

On the other hand, the defendant's defense that the defendant paid the uniforms to the plaintiff is written in the Dop and Nos. 3 and 4.