logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.07.14 2015고단7437
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against victim D;

A. On September 6, 2012, the Defendant of the crime committed on or around September 6, 2012, imported the Defendant’s “F” clothes store located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-si, on September 2012, on the condition of good condition that the Defendant would import the Defendant’s “Dker Quaker Cheongker Cheongker Cheongker.

It must pay the full amount in lieu.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the capacity to import the above clothing directly, and it was inevitable for him to be supplied through a customer who did not directly deal with the above clothing, and even if he received the clothing payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to provide the clothing by using the clothing import with its own store operating expenses and living expenses.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was paid KRW 5 million on September 6, 2012 by the victim.

B. On September 13, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime may send the victim’s clothes “50 million won to the victim at the place of Seocho Skuaker Quaker’s Cheongbaeon on September 2012, 2012.”

“A false statement” was made.

However, even if the defendant receives the money as described in paragraph 1(A), he did not have any intention or ability to provide the clothing by using it for clothing import.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was paid KRW 5 million on September 13, 2012 from the victim.

(c)

On September 24, 2012, the Defendant sent clothing money to the victim on September 24, 2012 because he/she could seek Abeck CDs expenses to the victim at a restaurant in Daegu Franc City on September 24, 2012.

G. The phrase “FEA” was false.

However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to return the money received as the purchase name of Quaker Quaker, and even if he was given additional money as stated in Section 1-A, he did not have the intention or ability to provide clothing by using it as clothing import.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.

arrow