The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was a person who served as the chairman of the Provisional Emergency Countermeasure Committee of Busan Jin-gu, Busan, on April 2012, and D was elected as the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives around April 9, 2012.

On June 1, 2012, the provisional emergency countermeasure committee of the above apartment building brought a conflict between residents as a matter of distribution of compensation received in relation to the nearby apartment construction after the above D was elected as the chairperson, and around June 1, 2012, the provisional emergency countermeasure committee of the above apartment building filed a lawsuit against D, who is the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment building, to suspend the performance of duties and appoint an acting representative to the Busan District Court, and the defendant was the same as the person of the provisional emergency countermeasure committee in charge of the chairperson

On May 20, 2012, the Defendant, at the office of the above apartment management office, prepared a written public notice of the title "public notice of holding a temporary emergency countermeasures committee" in order to recruit residents who will not receive compensation, and affixed a seal affixed to the "C apartment representative chairperson" who was held in advance without permission of the above D, on the side of the "chairperson of the temporary emergency countermeasures committee" as stated in the bottom of the above public notice, and posted the above public notice on the apartment bulletin board, etc. around that time, from around that time to June 11, 2012, the Defendant posted the above public notice on five occasions as shown in the attached list of crimes. The Defendant affixed an official seal, who is the chairperson of the C apartment representative committee, and posted it on the bulletin board, etc. of the above apartment.

For the purpose of exercising, the defendant used the seal of other person in a fraudulent manner five times, and used the seal of other person unlawfully used.

2. The judgment of the defendant and the defendant's defense counsel asserted that they had the right to use the seals properly stated in the facts charged.