Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the amount ordered to be paid under paragraph 2 below shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of D Launa car (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendants are the owners of the following: (a) the Defendants are operating a gas charging lawsuit for vehicle use in the name of “F” in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon; (b) the Defendants installed an automatic string machine (hereinafter “the instant string machine”) and provided the instant string service.

B. In the case of the instant vehicle, the driver of the vehicle shall stop the vehicle at the right side of the entrance of the instant vehicle while leaving the stop line after entering the said vehicle, and keep the vehicle in a neutral state, and need not take the balke (the vehicle shall move down at a low speed depending on the rail). A notice stating such details is attached to the right side of the entrance of the instant vehicle at the entrance.

(c)

On March 16, 2019, the Plaintiff driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle at around 12:00, and entered the instant vehicle, and followed the Plaintiff’s barc, without neutrality. However, G, who is an employee operating the instant vehicle, had the Plaintiff run the instant vehicle without confirming it. As a result, the Plaintiff’s vehicle conflicts with the bush (topbush), etc. installed inside the instant vehicle, resulting in an accident that may cause damage to the Plaintiff’s left side of the vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(d)

The Plaintiff spent 531,964 won in total, including the Plaintiff’s repair cost of KRW 251,964, and the vehicle sirens cost of KRW 280,00 for 4 days due to the instant accident.

[Ground for recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 8 (including a number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the video, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the above facts of recognition of the liability for damages, the Defendants jointly and severally do not confirm the status of the Plaintiff’s vehicle after entering the instant three-year period without properly verifying the status of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.