1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,304,00 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from January 11, 2014 to July 15, 2016.

1. The following facts of basic facts do not conflict between the parties, or are appraised without regard to Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 7, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 4-1 to 3, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 2's testimony, witness Eul's testimony, appraiser C's detailed repair cost appraisal as of the accident of this case.

As a result of this court's inquiry inquiry about appraiser C, the same image taken at the time of the accident of this case (Evidence No. 2) was evaluated again.

D The Plaintiff was a co-defendant in the instant case, and the Plaintiff withdrawn the lawsuit against D on April 2, 2015.

It can be recognized in full view of the whole purport of arguments as a result of the examination of the principal, and contrary to this, the result of the examination of the principal is not trustable.

The Plaintiff is a person who operates an automatic gas station (hereinafter referred to as “instant gas station”) with the trade name called “F gas station in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government” (hereinafter referred to as “instant gas station”) and provides services to customers who are 50,000 won or more to provide free rent-free service.

B. The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with D with respect to G K5 automobiles (hereinafter “instant Defendant”).

C. Around 12:42 on January 11, 2014, D driven the instant Defendant’s vehicle, and entered the third secretary, who is installed in the instant gas station. On the right side of the entrance of the vehicle, D posted a notice that the vehicle would be placed in “P”.

B, who is an employee of the gas station of this case, led the Defendant vehicle of this case to the three-dimensional location, notified D that the Defendant vehicle of this case would put the Defendant vehicle of this case into the “P”, and operated the instant detailed vehicle of this case.

E. However, more than 10 seconds after the operation of the instant vehicle, the Defendant vehicle in the instant case is slowly about 1m.