logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2016.06.07 2016가단1910
임차보증금
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. 23,206,325 won and 22,44,915 won among them shall be repaid from December 29, 2004.

Reasons

In full view of the evidence No. 1 and evidence No. 2, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to May 18, 2005 as to the return of deposit for lease on a deposit basis by Suwon District Court No. 2004Da88403, May 18, 2005, and “the Defendant” as to the Plaintiff:

(a) 23,206,325 won and 22,44,915 won among them with 20% interest per annum from December 29, 2004 to the date of full payment;

B. 3,700,000 won and above from April 1, 2005

It shall pay 350,000 won each month by the date of completion of payment of the money stated in this subsection.

"A judgment was obtained, and this judgment became final and conclusive on June 10, 2005, and the plaintiff received KRW 450,000 from the defendant's corporeal movables by enforcing compulsory execution on or around February 22, 2006 (this subparagraph is applicable from November 30, 2003 to December 28, 2004 at the rate of 1,211,410 won per annum 5% per annum from November 30, 2003 to December 28, 2004, and if the remaining amount is added to the principal, it shall be stated in the Disposition A. 23,206,325 won). Since the plaintiff can be acknowledged that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit of this case in order to suspend the expiration of the extinctive prescription of the claims under the above judgment, the defendant is obligated to pay the amount stated in the order to the plaintiff.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow