logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 06. 15. 선고 2018두35865 판결
(심리불속행)지주회사 현물출자에 따른 과세이연 받은 주주에게 신고의무 전제로 신고불성실 가산세 부과할 수 있는지 여부[일부국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-71361 ( October 19, 2018)

Title

(C) Whether a person who has been granted taxation deferment following investment in kind in the holding company may be subject to a tax return due to a failure to report.

Summary

(C) The taxation authority is not allowed to impose the additional tax on negligent tax returns on the premise of the above duty to report. (4) The taxation authority is not allowed to impose the additional tax on negligent tax returns on the premise of the above duty to report if the grounds for suspending the tax deferment under Article 38-2 (3) of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act arise.

Related statutes

Article 38-2 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act (Special Taxation on Stock Investment in Kind)

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

on 15, 2018

arrow