logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2017.05.11 2016고단1718
의료법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for ten months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 10,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B The president who operates the port and border points of the “H Council member” in North-gu G at the port of port as a medical person, and Defendant A is a person who has been qualified as a nursing assistant in the above hospital from August 2014 to April 2015 and worked as a chief secretary.

1. Defendant A

(a) No person other than a medical person who violates the Medical Service Act shall perform medical practice;

While working at the “H Council member,” the Defendant her president B, from October 6, 2014 to October 28, 201, had been willing to perform a medical act, such as a sexually extended surgery, against the patient who was hospitalized in the “Seoul National University Hospital” due to the infinite finite infection for 23 days, and the Defendant was willing to perform a medical act against the patient who was suffering from the Defendant’s “H Council member”.

around October 6, 2014, the Defendant provided counseling with I (50 Does) who found H Council members, and received KRW 1,200,000 for operating expenses, and provided medical services to 34 patients in total over 34 times from around that time to October 28, 2014, such as the written list of crimes in attached Form 37,360,000.

Accordingly, the defendant was not a medical person but a medical person.

B. After anesthesia a patient’s sexual organ, the surgery was conducted by means of cutting out the knife part of the sexual organ into a knife for the surgery and blocking the luxal hexal hexal surgery. The Defendant intending to obtain the cost of the operation by deceiving the patient with the rax for the operation after anesthesiaing the patient’s sexual organ, and by deceiving the patient with the rax for the operation.

Since the Defendant did not intend to perform the operation as well as the method of performing the operation, the Defendant did not have the intention or ability to alleviate the lavement of the patient by performing the operation, and the Defendant performed the operation as above.

arrow