Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 10, 2019, the Defendant posted a notice on the Defendant’s dormitory located in Chungcheongbuk-dong C, stating that he sells 6S 64 opphone 64 opphone 64 in the Internet DC through a mobile phone, and false statement on the victim F who contacted with the Defendant, stating that he would send 64 opphone 64 opphone 64 in the face of transfer of money.

However, the defendant did not own 64 opphones at the time, and only planned to receive money from the victim to use it for the sports discussions, and did not have the intent or ability to send the above goods to the victim on his own.

On May 10, 2019, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 120,000 from the account in the name of the Defendant G bank account (Account Number: H) in the name of the Defendant in the name of the sale proceeds, and acquired KRW 398,000 in total four times from March 21, 2019 to May 30, 2019, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of F, B, I, and J;

1. Details of transfer, details of each E App dialogue, details of each K dialogue, certificates of transfer, details of text dialogue, certificates of deposit, details of transactions on automated machines, details of transactions on automated machines, and application of statutes on text;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Articles 32(1)3 and 32(2) and 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Dismissal, etc. of Application for Compensation Order [the defendant submitted the details of deposit by asserting repayment, and the scope of liability for compensation is unclear. Thus, it is not reasonable to issue a compensation order in the criminal procedure of this case]. The reason for the sentencing, the frequency of fraud, the amount of fraud, and the amount of repayment are completed.