A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2011, the Defendant, at the Seoul Southern District Court, sentenced 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and on April 18, 201, the same court sentenced 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for an attempted crime of obstruction of official duties, etc., and completed the execution of each of the above punishment on May 28, 2012.

[2014 Highest 4824] On December 7, 2014, the Defendant stated that “D” restaurant located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “D” in Guro-gu, Seoul, the Defendant received 112 reports that “the Defendant interfered with the business of drinking and drinking,” and was urged by the E District Assistant F, Seoul, Police Station E-gu, Seoul, to refrain from a disturbance and to return home, the Defendant expressed that “the police officer “I go to go to go to the house on the day he would come to go to go to the house,” and continued to interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of the duties by having the head of the above police officer displayed four times a week, and again interfered with the above 12-day report on the above part concerning the chest by the police officer on May 2, 2012.

[2015 Highest 300]

1. On January 26, 2015, at around 12:40, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business, without any justifiable reason, obstructed the victim’s bar business by avoiding disturbance for about one hour during the period of time, including, but not limited to, the 12:40 of the victim H in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s “Icker”, and without any reason, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s bar business by force.

2. The Defendant destroyed and damaged property in order to avoid disturbance as above at the date, time, and place mentioned in the above paragraph (1), and to receive a request from the victim H, thereby damaging the entrance glass equivalent to KRW 500,000,000 in the market price owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (report on confirmation of repeated crimes);

1. Articles 136(1), 314(1), and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;