1. The plaintiffs confirm that they are the defendant's assistant members.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Basic facts I died on July 23, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased"), and 5 South (J, K, L, M, N) 3 women (O, P, and Plaintiff) as their children.

Plaintiff

B, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff D are the descendants of each deceased as N’s daughters, Plaintiff E, and Plaintiff F, while Plaintiff G is the grandchildren of J as the grandchildren of the deceased.

The Evidence A Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number, if there is no special reference; hereinafter the same shall apply). For the purpose of the deceased’s use as the Dow field (the land cultivated to use it as the expense required for the sculing of the sculpland, such as the tombland) and the land owned by the deceased, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on December 29, 1965 with respect to the Rab field among the land owned by the deceased on July 22, 196, Qu-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as the “R forest”) and the land of the 827.5 square meters in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu (hereinafter referred to as the “S land”), and the entire real estate listed above was completed on July 22, 1969 for sale and purchase by M.

The evidence Nos. 8 and B No. 1, L and M completed the registration of ownership transfer for 1/5 shares of each of the instant real property due to the gift of November 23, 1987 to T (L's children), N, U (K's children), V (M's grandchildren), and W (J's grandchildren) on November 24, 1987.

The evidence No. 5-1, No. 2, No. 4, and No. 1 of A shall be included in the deceased's lineal descendants, and the defendant's inaugural general meeting was held on January 31, 1995, with the members of the adult male who are not less than 20 years of age among the deceased's lineal descendants.

At the above inaugural general meeting, there was a resolution that the Defendant would restore the ownership of each of the instant real estate held in title by T, N, U, V, and W, and the officers of the Defendant’s Vice-Chairperson, adviser, etc. were elected.

No. 5 of the No. 5. The Defendant enacted the sexually explicit rules on August 29, 1996, and Article 2 of the Code is the clerical error of “Arbin I and Arbin X “Y”.

To obtain the prescribed procedure of the main body as a male who is 19 years of age or older.