1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The chief officer of the department in charge of the business decided 4 tenders, such as R 20, 21 bidding, R Ma 22,22, 23 bidding, Q Ma 17 bidding, R Ma Ma 24 (or Ma24, 25) bid (the pertinent bid is not actually ordered, and the accurate name of the construction is not known) through prior meetings, as indicated in the following Table 6: (a) the chief officer in charge of the business decided that the successful bid will be awarded (or the above agreement in 207).

However, the R Ma24 (or Ma24, 25) tender was not implemented as agreed because it did not place an order.

Examining the contents agreed by 8 companies, including the Plaintiff, etc. at the time of M 205 to 206, as indicated in the following Table 7: R 20,20, 21 bidders, FR Me22, 23 bidding, H Q Q 22, 23 biddingJ, CR Ma24 (or Mere 24, 25) bidding I, and M, the agreement between 8 companies, such as the Plaintiff, etc. at the time of the 2005 to 2006 bid.

The 7th 2005 to 2006 and the order of orders for the 2007-2007-2007-2007-2007-H 3K 4 H 5 J 6C 7 M 8I* : The order of orders is divided. The point line: 4th : The plaintiff et al., who participated in the 2007-2-2007-2-2-2007-2-2007-207-207-207-207-207-207-207-7-206-7-200-7-7-7-200-7-7-200-7-7-20-7-20-7-20-7-20-7-20-7-20-7-20-77-20-77-20-7.

The name of the construction work for which eight preliminary agreements have been made by the plaintiff, etc. in 2009.