Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 20, 2015, at around 22:35, the Defendant sent domestic violence to the Defendant’s house located at the Defendant’s house located in Chungcheongnam-si, 103 602, and received domestic violence reports and received statements from the Defendant’s spouse D, etc., at one time in his/her hand, he/she took the face of the victim F of the slope of the Chungcheong Police Station E zone belonging to the Defendant’s spouse, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of 112 reported police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A witness F or D's legal statement;

1. Statement of the suspect of the defendant;

1. Application of each of the police statements made to G and D

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is heavy, the defendant's act of disturbance, etc., which reflects the crime, and there are no criminal records or criminal records of the same kind that exceed the fine, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of the case.

The acquittal portion

1. On August 20, 2015, the summary of the facts charged: (a) around 22:35, the Defendant sent domestic violence at the Defendant’s house located in Chungcheongnam-si, C apartment 103 602, and was present at the Defendant’s spouse, and (b) sought to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of performance of official duties; and (c) the police officer affiliated with the same district, such as the slope victim F belonging to the E Zone in the Chungcheong Police Station E Zone, the Defendant tried to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of performance of official duties; and (d) on one occasion, he/she sawed the victim’s face at the victim for about 14 days.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders and at the same time injured the victim.

2. The F police officer’s summary of the Defendant’s assertion did not inform the F police officer of the U.S. doctrine when intending to arrest the Defendant, and sold.