logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.10.27 2015고정475
식품위생법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates an urban area delivery specialty store under the trade name of "C" in the Full-Time City B of Jeonju-si.

Anyone who intends to engage in a food manufacturing and processing business shall register with the competent authority.

Nevertheless, the defendant, from February 2, 2015 to March 31, 2015, is engaged in manufacturing and processing of urban communities within the "C" located in Yansan-gu B in the Jeonju-si, and is engaged in manufacturing and processing business of delivering approximately 30 food production and processing business to about 30 enterprises in the Jeonju-si, and is engaged in business without being registered with the competent authorities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of the defendant;

1. Each report on internal investigation (related to the details of the arrival of internal investigation and attachment of official documents related to the Woosan-gu Office), and each investigation report (Attachment to a management ledger related to the confirmation of business books and attachment of food service business permission (report));

1. A copy of a management ledger for business books, food service business licenses (report);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 95 of the Food Sanitation Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and Articles 95-2 and 37 (5) of the same Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and is in depth divided, and the defendant appears to have been found to have been engaged in the same type of business by taking over business from a person who sells urban communities only after reporting the business of food service at the place of this case (37 pages of evidence records). There are circumstances that some of the circumstances may be taken into account (37 pages of evidence records). There are no records that the defendant was punished or punished heavier than fine for the same crime, and there is no other records that the defendant was punished or sentenced heavier than fine. In addition, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case and the circumstances after the crime of this case

arrow