logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.05.19 2016고합658
마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The seized marijuana (840g) 5 weeks (No. 1), and the hemp in cultivation (60g).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Gohap 658"

1. Notwithstanding that the Defendant is not a handler of narcotics, etc., the Defendant, from March 2015 to August 31, 2016, installed facilities necessary for the manufacture of marijuana, such as chemical agents, cryp facilities, temperature, and lighting utensils, etc. necessary for the cultivation of marijuana from around Busan, Busan, from around August 31, 2016, and cultivated 57 marijuana plants in a cultivation manner, and sold harvested hemp plants to e inception.

Accordingly, the Defendant cultivated marijuana for the purpose of selling and buying marijuana.

2.No person engaged in the trade or possession of marijuana may trade or possess it for the purpose of trade or trade of it, the Defendant dealt with it as follows:

A. On August 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was transferred KRW 40g of the hemp plants cultivated under the foregoing paragraph (1) to the accounts in the H H’s name used by the Defendant around August 13, 2015, on the street near the G Park in the Subdivision-gu, Sungnam-si; and (b) was transferred KRW 4 million as the purchase price for marijuana to the accounts in the name of H used by the Defendant around August 13, 2015.

Accordingly, the Defendant sold approximately 40g of marijuana to E on the basis of gender in the amount of 4 million won.

B. Around 00:21 August 31, 2016, the Defendant in possession of marijuana kept 5 weeks of marijuana, 2 weeks of marijuana in cultivation, and 566g of leaf leaves, which were remaining after being sold to sexually French E at the places described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant possessed marijuana for the purpose of sale.

"2016 Gohap 783"

1. The Defendant committed the crime of December 7, 2009 to the victim I on or around December 2, 2009, “A part of the Defendant, after opening a cell phone under the victim’s name, will be used for the business of receiving a loan.”

The charges will be paid at the same time.

“.....”

However, the Defendant was a bad credit holder at the time, and even if the cell phone was opened due to the lack of certain income, there was no ability to pay the end price and the user fee.

Nevertheless, the defendant is above.

arrow